ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Establishing a sustainable urology program in northern Guatemala: an implementation report from El Petén (2024-2025).
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSubspecialty surgical care is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) attempt to bridge this gap through short-term medical trips (SMTs), but sustainability remains challenging. This report describes establishing a urology program in El Petén, Guatemala's largest region, as a model for sustainable subspecialty surgical care in LMICs.
methodsThis retrospective, single-institution review evaluated the Aid Via Action Inc. (AVA) urology program at Hospital Nacional de San Benito (HNSB), a departmental public hospital in El Petén, Guatemala, from June 2024 to June 2025. All AVA cases were reviewed, with a descriptive analysis of program development and implementation. Institutional approval was obtained from the hospital ethics committee and director. Patient selection included medical, anesthesia, and urologic evaluation. Equipment was obtained through donations and partnerships. Sterilization used a 2% glutaraldehyde (Cydex®) protocol. Data were analyzed descriptively in Microsoft Excel, complications categorized by the Clavien-Dindo system, and follow-up conducted through clinic visits, phone calls, and coordination with local physicians.
resultsDuring this period, a total of 37 urologic procedures were performed: 31 TURPs, 2 cystolithotomies, 2 vesicovaginal fistula repairs, 1 cystoscopy, and 1 circumcision. There were three complications-two cases of urinary retention following TURP and one surgical-site infection (all Clavien-Dindo Class II) following a cystolithotomy. The median follow-up was 88 days (IQR 73-98 days). There were no mortalities.
conclusionEarly outcomes demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a urology program in a resource-limited setting. Long-term success depends on local engagement and sustained urology staffing at HNSB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41145905What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.