Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145882›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

From skylight cues to magnetic fields: the toolkit of insect long-distance navigation.

Kayla M Goforth, Christine Merlin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evidence for cephalic magnetic map receptors in sea turtles.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kayla M GoforthDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77845-3258, USA. kmgoforth@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9587-5451
Christine MerlinDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77845-3258, USA. cmerlin@bio.tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2133-6972

Funding

Human Frontiers Science Program RGP019/2024National Science Foundation IOS-2224154Welch Foundation/Life Sciences Research Foundation R-A-0003-20240404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their tiny size, lepidopterans accomplish some of the most extraordinary migrations on Earth. Monarch butterflies and bogong moths, for example, travel vast distances to find the same seasonal sheltering sites year after year, and remarkably do so without any prior experience. How do these delicate creatures navigate so precisely across large and changing landscapes? Scientists have spent decades unraveling this mystery, revealing that lepidopterans possess a sophisticated suite of navigational tools that rival those of much larger animals. Lepidopteran compass systems rely on celestial cues like the sun, stars, and polarized light, as well as the Earth's magnetic field. Diurnal monarchs and nocturnal bogong moths have become model species for understanding how insects combine skylight and magnetic compasses to find their way. Recent discoveries have shed light on the neural circuits and genetic blueprints that power these compasses. In this review, we provide an overview of the navigational toolkit employed by lepidopteran migrants, dive into their mechanisms, and highlight future directions needed to fully decode the secrets of insect long-distance navigation.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationCuesInsectaMagnetic FieldsMothsSpatial NavigationAnimalsOrientationLepidopteraMagnetoreceptionNavigationSky compassVision

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.