ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Collaborative Care for Anxiety: Differences in Patient and Clinic-Level Characteristics on Treatment Outcomes in a Safety-Net Hospital System.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The collaborative care model (CoCM) is an evidence-based model shown to improve treatment of depression and anxiety in the primary care setting. However, there is limited research on CoCM outcomes in underserved populations and which factors impact outcomes. We performed a retrospective chart review to examine GAD-7 scores for patients (N = 1,034) seen in primary care clinics within an urban, safety-net hospital system. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and linear mixed models were used. Our population was 81% female and 89% self-identified Black or African American. There were significant reductions on GAD-7 scores from baseline to 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months follow-up (p < .001). The analysis suggested gender, patient age, clinic setting, and number of visits were significant. The effect sizes for these covariates were 0.94, 3.77, 1.98, and 0.74, respectively. Further research including patients' social determinants of health and comorbidities may help refine CoCM and optimize its effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41145851What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.