ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
What is risk in clinical genetics? Designing and piloting tools to evaluate risk in clinical genetics using failure modes and effects analysis.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in genomic medicine: from diagnosis to patient perspectives.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- When clinical genetics turns the risk lens on itself.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Risk exists throughout medicine. Understanding health system pressure points permits implementation of controls for risk reduction. The literature lacks a systematic approach to risk evaluation in Clinical Genetics. We aimed to develop Clinical Genetics-specific risk assessment tools to prospectively monitor risk. A retrospective review of 115 cases with identified adverse events or near misses in Clinical Genetics in Ireland was used to design a process map to define the steps where risk occurs across the patient journey through clinical genetics. We piloted a clinical audit form using the process map to capture risk event frequency. The draft process map and audit form were trialled (2022-2023) in 5 other European clinical genetics centres for validity and usability, and 2 re-audited in 2024 to assess utility. Using narrative summaries from the case review, we modified the national health risk severity scoring for clinical genetics use. The design of the risk process map, risk frequency audit and severity assessment align with Failure Modes and Effect Analysis methodology. Adverse events occurred in >3% of appointments in 4 of 6 centres (range 0.8-20.3%). High frequency failure modes varied by centre and included consent, sample processing, and patient discussion. Re-audit results reflected interventions introduced since initial audit. We propose these tools provide a standardized approach to discussing systematic risk in clinical genetics, and can be used to prospectively monitor adverse events, allowing controls to be put in place, reducing risk, thereby improving quality of service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.