ArticleScientific reports2025
Experiential factors mediate the link between brain status and theory of mind in building-up cognitive reserve.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social cognition processes are essential for social interaction. Theory of Mind (ToM) is a complex component of social cognition involved in understanding one's own and others' thoughts and feelings, relying on well-established brain networks (ToM hardware). Interindividual differences emerge in how people recruit brain resources for mentalizing operations (ToM software), revealing a gap between brain status and cognitive performance. The present research aimed to test the role of cognitive reserve (CR) in explaining this gap. Fifty-seven adults underwent an MRI to evaluate neural integrity, and a neuropsychological assessment including ToM measures, and a retrospective interview on lifetime experiential factors. The tri-component model of CR was considered: neural integrity (both coarse-grained intracranial volume, and fine-grained ToM network volume indexes), experiential factors, and ToM performance. Multiple regression and mediation models confirmed the CR hypothesis, highlighting the predictive role of both ToM neural integrity and experiential factors (Work and Leisure time) on ToM performance, and the mediating role of the experiential factors on the link between ToM neural integrity and performance. The study suggested the role of CR in social cognition. Future studies may explore the implications of this relationship in clinical and rehabilitation settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.