SynthesisScientific reports2025
Preclinical pancreatic cancer mouse models for treatment with small molecule inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preclinical pancreatic cancer mouse models for treatment with small molecule inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is an aggressive malignant disease with poor prognosis, often diagnosed late, progressing rapidly, and resistant to chemotherapy. Although small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) show promise in preclinical PC models, translation into clinics remains challenging. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we screened literature according to predefined criteria to identify preclinical PC mouse models used for SMI therapy in primary tumors, assess reporting quality, and evaluate tumor reduction, heterogeneity and publication bias. Following a pre-registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD42022314932), literature searches in PubMed and Embase yielded 2972 articles, of which 297 were included for data extraction. Most studies used PDX models or MiaPaCa-2 and PANC-1 cell lines as heterotopic xenografts, with Foxn1nu mice representing the predominant genetic background. Reporting quality, assessed using the ARRIVE guidelines, revealed substantial gaps, particularly in blinding (94% not reported), inclusion/exclusion criteria (49% not reported), and randomization (34% not reported). Meta-regression accounted for part of the observed heterogeneity and funnel plot asymmetry was consistent with publication bias. This study emphasized the large variability among preclinical PC mouse models used to investigate SMI candidates and the complexity of model choice highlighting the critical need for improved reporting practices to enhance reproducibility and reliability of preclinical tumor models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.