ArticleScientific reports2025
Using Sentinel 2A and Landsat 8 imagery to assess changes in forest carbon storage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating carbon storage using high-resolution imagery of dominant species and types is often constrained by the availability of data. Herein, we developed a carbon storage estimation model for dominant species and types using high-resolution Sentinel 2A imagery and compared the two approaches using lower-resolution Landsat 8 imagery for whole-forest estimation. Approach 1 employs a traditional method using in-situ carbon storage measurements with Landsat 8 vegetation indices, whereas Approach 2 uses Sentinel 2A carbon storage estimates as a reference. Using Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Multiple Linear Regression models, we compared both approaches and found that Approach 2 estimates matched the Sentinel 2A results for different species and types more accurately, including Populus, Salix, Pinus tabuliformis, and shrub types. At the same time, our research results show that machine learning models effectively estimated carbon storage using Sentinel 2A imagery and dominant species classification. For the whole forest assessment with Landsat 8 imagery, Approach 2 yielded superior accuracy over Approach 1. This method enabled the calculation of historical carbon storage, showing that the Ordos Forest carbon storage increased by 27 Mt (89%) from 2013 to 2023, demonstrating the feasibility of long-term carbon monitoring using lower-resolution imagery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.