ReviewCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2025
Thrombosis and cancer what do the recommandations say.
Review in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a critical complication in oncology, significantly contributing to morbidity and mortality among cancer patients. The hypercoagulable state associated with malignancy is often aggravated by surgical procedures and systemic anticancer therapies, which further elevate the risk of thrombotic events. Effective management of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is essential and relies on evidence-based prophylactic strategies. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) remain the cornerstone of anticoagulation for high-risk patients due to their well-established efficacy and safety profiles. The emergence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, offers new opportunities in CAT management. These agents have shown promising efficacy and convenience in clinical trials. However, their widespread application is constrained by concerns regarding bleeding risks and potential interactions with cancer therapies. To address these challenges, risk stratification tools such as the Khorana score and the more recent COMPASS-CAT score have been developed, enabling clinicians to identify patients at high risk and implement tailored thromboprophylaxis.Hence these scores are appropriate for ambulatory patients. Furthermore, novel anticoagulants targeting factor XI are being investigated and may represent a breakthrough in improving the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation in cancer patients. These advancements emphasize the growing importance of a personalized and multidisciplinary approach in managing CAT, integrating innovative therapies and precision risk assessment to optimize patient outcomes. This review highlights recent progress in the field of cancer-associated thrombosis, focusing on advancements in risk assessment models, evolving anticoagulation strategies, and the development of emerging therapies aimed at reducing complications while improving clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41145732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.