ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the effect of task engagement during intertrial rest periods on micro offline gains.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Explicit motor sequence learning (ESL) consolidation manifests as skill improvements during rest periods that last minutes or longer. However, recent evidence suggests that ESL improvements also occur during inter-trial rest periods that last seconds (micro offline gains; MOGS). While indirect evidence supports that MOGS is a phenomenon tied to brief periods of wakeful rest, this hypothesis has never been directly tested. Prior studies suggest that MOGS and sequence learning in general rely on associative memory processes that link sequence elements across time and space. However, evidence supporting this hypothesis in healthy humans is lacking. We reasoned that if wakeful rest during inter-trial ESL periods is necessary for MOGS, replacing these periods with an engaging task should degrade MOGS. Additionally, we explored whether associative processes support MOGS, predicting that associative memory encoding during inter-trial periods would further degrade MOGS. To this end, we compared the performance of three groups that differed only in whether inter-trial periods included no task (REST), an associative encoding task (ENC), or a semantic judgment task (SEM). We identified no significant group differences in ESL or MOGS, which were confirmed by Bayesian analyses. These results are consistent with the notion that MOGS capture inter-trial performance changes rather than a rapid form of consolidation that requires rest or depends on associative memory processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.