Observational studySurgical endoscopy2026
Needle-knife sphincterotomy does not independently increase post-ERCP pancreatitis: a 20-year retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.
Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: Impact of Transpancreatic Septotomy, Needle-Knife Precut, and Duodenal Diverticulum in 1226 Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecut techniques and needle-knife sphincterotomy (NKS) are commonly employed to achieve biliary access in cases of difficult cannulation during ERCP. Although historically associated with increased complications, recent data suggest this risk may reflect procedural complexity rather than the technique itself. This study aimed to evaluate the independent association of NKS with post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and other adverse events using a large, single-operator cohort.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study, analyzing data from a prospectively maintained database of 2786 therapeutic ERCPs performed by a single experienced endoscopist between 2001 and 2021. Patients were categorized into those undergoing NKS after failed standard cannulation and those receiving primary endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression were used to adjust for baseline and procedural confounders. A predefined subgroup of difficult standard ES cases (≥ 5 cannulation attempts) was also compared with NKS.
resultsPEP occurred more frequently in the NKS group than in the ES group (3.7% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.001), but this association lost statistical significance after adjustment (adjusted OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 0.91-3.26, p = 0.11). Independent predictors of PEP included ≥ 5 cannulation attempts, pancreatic duct cannulation, and acinarization. In subgroup analysis, PEP rates did not differ significantly between NKS and difficult ES cases. Perforation remained significantly more frequent in the NKS group (adjusted OR: 5.35, 95% CI: 1.82-21.3), while bleeding rates were similar. Overall complications were higher with NKS (adjusted OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.20-2.72), largely due to perforation.
conclusionsNKS does not independently increase the risk of PEP when procedural complexity is accounted for, but carries a higher risk of perforation. Early transition to NKS in appropriately selected cases may reduce unnecessary trauma and improve outcomes. Operator expertise remains critical to optimizing safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41145698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.