ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Artificial intelligence-assisted video analysis for evaluating ergonomic strain in robotic surgeons: a pilot study from the SAGES ergonomics task force.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMost surgeons experience work-related pain and musculoskeletal injuries (WRMSI). Though robotic surgery has been speculated to reduce the risk of WRMSI compared to open and laparoscopic approaches, the majority of robotic surgeons still experience neck, back, and upper extremity discomfort. Despite growing use of robot-assisted surgery (RAS), there is limited research on the ergonomic risks faced by robotic surgeons. This study aims to evaluate ergonomic strain during RAS.
methodsArtificial intelligence (AI)-assisted video analysis was used on a convenience sample of experienced faculty-level robotic surgeons to assess their positioning, practice, and pain. Participants completed 3 repetitions of a standardized simulated surgical task on the daVinci Xi robotic surgery console. Video recordings were analyzed using AI-assisted kinematic assessment software (TuMeKe Ergonomics, San Mateo CA). Validated subjective assessment tools and a general ergonomic practices questionnaire were calculated. Spearman's correlation coefficient evaluated the relationship between the time spent in medium-to-high-risk ergonomic positions and the corresponding reported discomfort.
resultsThe 5 participants had a mean age of 50.7 years and performed a mean of 3.5 robotic cases weekly. 60% were female. The average RULA score was 5.2 (SD 0.84), exceeding the "acceptable" threshold of 2. The trunk had the worst objective posture score (3/6), and participants spent 32% of the operative time in overall medium- to high-risk positions. There was significant correlation between reported discomfort and time spent in medium-to high-risk positions.
conclusionsAI-assisted video analysis successfully identified high-risk ergonomic postures in robotic surgeons, correlating with subjective discomfort scores. This study highlights the need for ergonomic interventions in RAS and lays the groundwork for real-world intraoperative assessments across surgical modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41145696What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.