ArticleScientific reports2025
Phishing detection on webpages in European non-English languages based on machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning-based phishing detection is crucial for preventing zero-day attacks. State-of-the-art phishing detection performs well on English webpages. However, it is not adequately accurate for webpages in minor languages. This work significantly improves phishing detection in European countries where minor languages are predominantly spoken. The proposed language-based phishing detection outperforms state-of-the-art methods for webpages in minor languages, achieving 99% accuracy on local webpages in the following countries: the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Croatia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and Slovenia. The main improvement lies in reducing the false positive rate, where local benign webpages are incorrectly identified as phishing. The proposed method reduces the false positive rate by up to a factor of 10 for webpages in minor languages. The results are statistically robust across different webpage sets, scaled for real-world use. The Shapiro-Wilk test confirms a normal distribution of the results in each tested country, with p-values consistently above 0.05. Paired T-tests yield p-values consistently below 0.05, indicating statistically significant improvements in each country. The low variability in the results further demonstrates the robustness of the proposed method. To foster reproducibility, the source code, datasets, and raw results are made publicly available, including approximately two million local webpages from 16 countries. Reference data from English-speaking and major-language-speaking countries are also included. This work advances phishing detection for webpages in minor languages and contributes to more inclusive global cybersecurity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.