ArticleLeukemia2026
Different immunotherapeutic combinations enhance specific T cell immune responses against leukemic cells, as well as leukemic progenitor cells, in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global bibliometric analysis of TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: research hotspots and evolution.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- CAR-T cell therapy in cancer immunotherapy - Biology, clinical successes, and emerging challenges: A review.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Review
- TIM-3 in AML: a janus-faced orchestrator of immune exhaustion and leukemic self-renewal.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Immunotherapeutic Potential of Mutated NPM1 for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunotherapeutic approaches have become increasingly important in cancer therapy, including for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Despite being shown to be effective in the context of stem cell transplants for almost 50 years, further improvements are required to prevent relapse and its associated morbidity. The therapeutic use of immune checkpoint inhibition in AML is still under debate. We have shown some positive effects of it on cancer control ex vivo. We found that anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibodies in combination with azacitidine (AZA) had the most pronounced effect on T-cell activation and control of leukemic progenitor/stem cell growth. We identified which leukemia-associated antigen (LAA) stimulated the largest IFNγ immune response by T cells from AML patients with and without the nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutation and which immunotherapeutic strategy, either alone or in combination with the immune checkpoint anti-PD-1, could enhance immune responses against leukemic cells. Anti-PD-1 with AZA had a particularly strong effect with a mean colony reduction of 56%. Taken together, combinations of immunotherapeutic approaches increase antigen-specific immune responses against leukemic cells but also leukemic progenitor/stem cells. The combination of LAA-peptides with anti-PD-1 antibody and one further immunotherapeutic could be an interesting option for further clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.