ArticleScientific reports2025
An exploratory study of physicians' familiarity, knowledge, and willingness to prescribe pre-exposure prophylaxis in the MENA region.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is among the most effective tools used for HIV prevention. Primary care providers (PCPs) play a crucial role in identifying people at risk and initiating care. There is a gap in research on PrEP use in the MENA region; this study aims to assess PCPs' knowledge, familiarity with PrEP and willingness to prescribe it. An online survey targeted PCPs and infectious disease (ID) specialists across the MENA region, with most responses coming from Lebanon. Data included demographics, practice characteristics, perceived knowledge, familiarity with PrEP, willingness to prescribe it, and barriers. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were applied to compare groups. Seventy-five providers responded, sex ratio nearly 1:1, most being PCPs. ID specialists more often treated STIs and cared for people living with HIV than PCPs (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). 40% rated themselves "somewhat unfamiliar/unfamiliar" with PrEP, and only 24% felt confident answering patients' questions. While 73% were willing to prescribe PrEP, 64% had never done so. More PCPs (78.3%) than ID specialists (19.6%) had never prescribed PrEP (p = 0.005). Barriers to prescribing PrEP included lack of knowledge, financial coverage (p < 0.001), governmental policy regulating PrEP use (p < 0.001), and counselling time (all p < 0.001). Findings highlight significant gaps in knowledge and practice, particularly among PCPs, despite high willingness to prescribe. Coordinated efforts involving education, policy, and financial support are essential to expand PrEP implementation in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.