Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145664›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The interplay of olfaction and vision in host plant selection by Anthrenus verbasci.

Ferenc Deutsch, Sándor Kecskeméti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ferenc DeutschDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7625-6227
Sándor KecskemétiDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, HUN-REN, Budapest, Hungary. kecskemeti.sandor@atk.hun-ren.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3952-8174

Funding

National Research, Development and Innovation Office FK 137579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthrenus verbasci is commonly associated with museums, where the larvae can destroy valuable collections and displays. In households they are a nuisance; carpets, fabrics, food-items, or any proteinaceous material can be damaged. Little is known about the host preference of adults, they are frequently seen on plants of the Apiaceae, yet we do not know why they are preferred. Contrast of white flowers attract these insects primarily, yet it is unknown if floral volatiles mediate host recognition. We observed a high abundance of A. verbasci adults on the umbels of Aegopodium podagraria and sought to determine whether this mass attraction is driven by floral volatiles. Gas chromatography coupled electroantennography, revealed 8 antennally active compounds from the headspace volatilome of A. podagraria. Y-tube assays confirmed that intact A. podagraria floral volatiles attracted A. verbasci adults significantly; however, this attraction was reduced when damaged umbels were presented. In Petri dish experiments, germacrene-D induced aversion, highlighting a possible repellency. Beetles seemed to prefer discs baited with A. podagraria headspace volatiles at first, yet choice shifted towards the visual stimulus of dried umbellets at the end of the experiments. We have concluded that olfaction plays an important role in host recognition of A. verbasci.

Indexed as

ApiaceaeColeopteraHost-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsArthropod AntennaeBehavior, AnimalFlowersSmellVision, OcularVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic CompoundsAegopodium podagrariaAnthrenus verbasciBehaviour experimentElectroantennographyGC-EADOlfactionVisionVolatile collection

Identifiers

PMID41145664
PMCPMC12559408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.