Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145644›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Applying machine learning to predict quality ANC determinants in Bangladesh: a BDHS-2022 cross-sectional study.

Tanzila Tamanna, Shohel Mahmud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tanzila TamannaDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, 1342, Bangladesh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7715-5252
Shohel MahmudDepartment of Statistics, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, 3814, Bangladesh. smahmud@nstu.edu.bd.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1774-1636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality antenatal care (ANC) is critical for maternal and neonatal health. Despite improvements in healthcare, disparities in ANC access and quality persist, particularly in underserved areas of Bangladesh. This study aimed to identify the key determinants of quality ANC in Bangladesh and provide evidence to support data-driven maternal health strategies aligned with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3. This study analyzed data from 3,549 women aged 15-49 years from the BDHS 2022. Machine learning models, including Random Forest, XGBM, Neural Networks, and Logistic Regression, were applied to predict quality ANC. Feature importance was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Gini-based rankings to identify the most influential predictors. Only 21.9% of women received quality ANC. Wealth index, maternal and partner education, maternal age, media exposure, and urban residence emerged as the strongest determinants. Random Forest demonstrated the highest predictive performance (accuracy: 74.1%, precision: 79.8%, F1-score: 0.83). SHAP and feature importance analyses confirmed that wealth index was the most influential predictor. Significant inequalities in ANC quality and coverage exist in Bangladesh. Targeted interventions addressing socioeconomic and educational disparities, along with improved media outreach and urban-rural healthcare access, are essential to enhance maternal healthcare. These findings provide actionable insights for policy and programs aiming to achieve SDG 3 and reduce maternal mortality.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPrenatal CareQuality of Health CareAdolescentAdultBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMiddle AgedPregnancySocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultBangladeshBoruta algorithmMachine learning algorithmsMaternal healthQuality ANCRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID41145644
PMCPMC12559414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.