ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for overall survival in individuals with malignant meningiomas: a population-based study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malignant meningiomas are a rare type of central nervous system tumor. Therefore, little is known about the best methods for treating malignant meningiomas and their prognostic factors. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and develop a prognostic model for patients with malignant meningiomas. First, 2360 cases of malignant meningiomas from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were randomly divided into the primary and validation cohorts. Next, multivariate Cox regression identified several independent predictors of survival in malignant meningioma patients. These included patient demographics (age, gender, race), tumor features (laterality, size, stage), treatment timing (months from diagnosis to treatment), treatment modality, and tumor history (counts of both in situ/malignant and benign/borderline tumors), as well as year of diagnosis. Third, a nomogram was used to represent the prediction model, which was built based on independent predictors and optimized using the Akaike information criterion. Finally, we evaluated the predictive performance using the concordance index and receiver operating characteristic curve and clinical value using decision curve analysis. Notably, the strong discrimination ability of the model was demonstrated by the concordance index of the nomogram and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, both of which were between 0.7 and 0.8. The calibration plots in both cohorts showed high agreement between actual observation and nomogram prediction, and decision curve analysis demonstrated the significant clinical value of the nomogram. In conclusion, the nomogram is a practical and useful tool for assessing prognosis and determining effective treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.