Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145621›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

SynergyFit energy recovery framework for human-centric power generation in multi-modal fitness environments.

Douglas Yeboah, Bismark Danso Annor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Douglas YeboahDepartment of Renewable Energy Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana. dyeboah@umat.edu.gh.
Bismark Danso AnnorDepartment of Renewable Energy Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for sustainable energy solutions has driven interest in capturing power from physical activity in fitness settings. This study introduces the SynergyFit Energy Recovery Model, a comprehensive theoretical framework for estimating and optimizing energy recovery across resistance, cardiovascular, and functional training. The model addresses the challenge of effectively harvesting energy in multi-modal exercise environments by identifying distinct recovery patterns: resistance training provides steady yields through consistent force application, while cardiovascular and functional training scale more rapidly with duration due to dynamic movement profiles. Validation against reported energy recovery values confirms the model's strong predictive robustness and alignment with established trends. For a training session with an average mass (plate and trainer) of 80 kg, the energy recovery results are as follows: Resistance training yields energy recoveries from 9324 J at 1.5 min to 4827.76 J at 5.0 min; Cardio training shows a marked increase, with energy recoveries ranging from 860.82 J at 1.5 min to 31,882.50 J at 5.0 min; Functional training produces energy recoveries from 466.93 J at 1.5 min to 7130.64 J at 5.0 min. The total energy recovery across these modalities ranges from 10,651.76 J to 43,840.90 J, depending on the exercise duration. The sensitivity analysis further demonstrates that increasing exercise mass, higher cardio training velocities, and longer resting periods significantly enhance energy recovery. Notably, cardio training exhibits the highest energy recoverable potential, with cumulative recovery reaching approximately 43.8 kJ per session. These insights highlight the critical role of optimizing exercise duration and parameters to maximize energy recovery. Overall, the novel SynergyFit Energy Recovery Model offers a significant advancement in understanding and improving energy recovery in fitness environments. By integrating multiple exercise modes, this model contributes to more efficient energy utilization and underscores the benefits of parameter optimization for enhanced sustainability in fitness facilities.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismExercisePhysical FitnessResistance TrainingHumansModels, TheoreticalExercise energy harvestingMulti-modal exercise systemsRenewable energy integrationSmart gym infrastructureTheoretical modeling

Identifiers

PMID41145621
PMCPMC12559200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.