ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of field of view variation on CTP assessment of infarct core and penumbra in acute ischemic stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Rapid Processing of Perfusion and Diffusion (RAPID) platform, a validated acute ischemic stroke diagnostic tool, excels in detecting penumbra in large vessel occlusion (LVO) and predicting final infarct volume in recanalized patients. Accurate CT perfusion image quality is essential for assessing infarct core and penumbra volumes. The image spatial resolution is based on the field of view (FOV) in the CT image, while it usually varies depending on the technician's decision. This study examines whether FOV size affects infarct core and penumbra volume measurements in the RAPID system. The study compared arterial input function (AIF), venous output function (VOF) peaks, and time-to-peak (TTP) between large (250 mm) and small (180 mm) FOVs. It also examined the relationship between FOV size and hypoperfusion, infarct core, and mismatch volumes in the RAPID system to assess FOV effects in CTP scans. 62 patients with ischemic infarction were included. The study found no significant differences (p > 0.05) in AIF TTP and VOF TTP between small and large FOVs. However, significant differences were observed in AIF peak (p < 0.001), VOF peak (p < 0.001), hypoperfusion volume (p < 0.001), infarct core volume (p = 0.003), and mismatch volume (p < 0.001) between the two FOV groups. The study concluded that higher spatial resolution CTP images are associated with higher AIF and VOF peaks, a larger hypoperfusion area, a smaller infarct core region, and a larger mismatch volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.