ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving phenolic antioxidants in Illicium griffithii fruit through optimizing subcritical water extraction method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Illicium griffithii is a medicinal and aromatic plant species found in the temperate broadleaf forests of the Northeast region of India. The fruit of this species has been traditionally used in ethnomedicine and holds significant economic potential. This study aimed to determine the optimal conditions for better recovery of phenolic antioxidants from Illicium griffithii fruit using subcritical water extraction. Box-Behnken Design (BBD) was used to assess the impact of temperature (100-220 °C), pressure (30-90 bar), and time (10-50 min) on the extraction yield of phenolic antioxidants. Total phenolic content (TPC) varied from 15.60 to 30.91 mg GAE/g dw; whereas total flavonoid content (TFC) from 1.48 to 2.44 mg QE/g dw; while DPPH from 19.23 to 24.70 µg AAE/g dw; and ABTS from 16.36 to 17.92 µg AAE/g dw. Under the optimal conditions (161.32 °C, 45 bar, and 30 min), the phytochemical (TPC- 30.91 ± 0.07 mg GAE/g dw; TFC- 2.07 ± 0.02 mg QE/g dw) recovery echoed the scavenging activities (DPPH - 23.27 ± 0.13 µg AAE/g dw; ABTS- 17.82 ± 0.03 µg AAE/g dw). The phenolic profile revealed the improved concentration (1.60 to 9.77 m/g), with predominant phenolic compounds such as gallic acid (9.77 mg/g), catechin (8.84 mg/g) and p-hydroxybenzoic acid (4.06 mg/g). Among the different process parameters, temperature has significantly influenced the recovery of the phenolic antioxidants in Illicium griffithii fruit. ATR-FTIR spectra confirmed the occurrence of alcoholic, phenolic, and aromatic compounds in the SWE extract, with variations in temperature and pressure notably influencing the aromatic and phenolic functional groups. The results show better efficacy of SWE process as compared to other processes in terms of higher yield, reduced time, higher bioactivity, etc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.