ArticleScientific reports2025
Using multiple machine learning algorithms to predict spinal cord injury in patients with cervical spondylosis: a multicenter study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acupotomy for Cervical Spondylosis-Related Neck Pain: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Degenerative cervical spondylosis, a chronic and progressive condition, has a considerable impact on global health. Spinal cord injury, a severe sequela of this disease, can result from this disease. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a valuable tool for medical data analysis, effectively predicting disease outcomes. A multicenter study involving retrospective analysis of data from 737 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis was performed. On the basis of clinical data obtained from three hospitals, a predictive model was developed and demonstrated using multiple ML algorithms. In accordance with the exclusion criteria, a training set consisting of 385 samples, a test set of 129 samples, and an external validation set of 149 samples were acquired. Through univariate analysis and LASSO regression, 11 core predictive factors were identified. Results: Among the 10 trained machine learning models, the random forest model exhibited superior performance, as evidenced by elevated AUC values and accuracy across both the training and testing sets. The incidence of cervical spondylosis is evidently high, with a rising trend noted among younger individuals. Early prediction of spinal cord injury in these patients is paramount. Machine learning was utilized in this study to ascertain key predictive factors and develop a model capable of supporting clinical decision-making. The random forest model, developed from extensive analysis of clinical and imaging features across multiple hospitals, was subjected to cross-validation for accuracy and stability. This model can assist surgeons in the development of precise, individualized treatment approaches, with the aim of enhancing therapeutic effectiveness and minimizing unnecessary medical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.