ArticleScientific reports2025
Sex specific seasonal variation in the diet of brown bears in human dominated landscapes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the foraging ecology of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in human-dominated landscapes is essential for effective wildlife management and conflict mitigation. In this study, we investigated the seasonal diet composition of brown bears in the Western Carpathians, Slovakia, using a combination of molecular genetic and microhistological scat analyses. We analysed 198 brown bear scats (101 males, 97 females) collected throughout the year in central Slovakia, to assess seasonal variation in diet, identify sex-specific foraging patterns, and evaluate the use of anthropogenic food resources. Vegetation constituted the primary dietary component year-round, with hard mast frequency dominating in spring (FO = 45%), autumn (FO = 67%), and winter (FO = 82%), while soft mast (FO = 48%) and anthropogenic food (FO = 30%) prevailed in summer. Dietary energy intake from anthropogenic food was considerable in spring (EDEC = 15%) but peaked in summer (EDEC = 34%) and was consistently higher in males across all seasons. In spring, males consumed a considerable amount of anthropogenic food (EDEC = 32%), while it was negligible for females (EDEC = 3%). In summer, male consumption of anthropogenic food increased further (EDEC = 40%), and although females still consumed less than males, their intake rose by 23% compared to spring (EDEC = 26%). Males also consumed more vertebrates and hard mast, whereas females relied more heavily on soft mast and natural food sources, likely reflecting sex-specific trade-offs between energetic needs and risk avoidance. Seasonal dietary diversity was highest in summer and lowest in winter, with the greatest trophic divergence between sexes occurring during spring and summer. These findings highlight the dietary plasticity of brown bears in response to seasonal and anthropogenic resource availability, and emphasize the importance of regulating anthropogenic food access, particularly supplemental feeding and agricultural crops, to reduce human-bear conflict.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.