Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145581›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ultra-conformable tattoo electrodes for providing sensory feedback via transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Mascia Antonello, Collu Riccardo, Paolini Roberto, Demofonti Andrea, Cordella Francesca, Zollo Loredana, Barbaro Massimo, Cosseddu Piero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mascia Antonello *Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Collu Riccardo *Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. riccardo.collu@unica.it.
Paolini RobertoResearch Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centered Technologies (CREO Lab), Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, 00128, Italy.
Demofonti AndreaResearch Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centered Technologies (CREO Lab), Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, 00128, Italy.
Cordella FrancescaResearch Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centered Technologies (CREO Lab), Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, 00128, Italy.
Zollo LoredanaResearch Unit of Advanced Robotics and Human-Centered Technologies (CREO Lab), Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, 00128, Italy. l.Zollo@unicampus.it.
Barbaro MassimoDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. massimo.barbaro@unica.it.
Cosseddu PieroDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. piero.cosseddu@unica.it.

Funding

Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro Gli Infortuni sul Lavoro BioInterNectSardegna Ricerche SMARTPATCH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the peripheral nervous system has been demonstrated to be effective in restoring somatotopic sensory information in subjects with amputations. It can be achieved using invasive electrodes, which require surgical implantation, or non-invasive electrodes, which are applied directly to the skin. Whereas less selective, non-invasive electrodes offer the advantage of avoiding surgical procedures. Additionally, commercially available wet Ag/AgCl electrodes lack adaptability to the irregular surface of a subject's residual limb, leading to detachment during movement or use. This study aims to address some of the limitations of non-invasive electrodes by proposing and validating the use of ultra-conformable Parylene C-based tattoo electrodes to restore somatotopic sensory information through transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the peripheral nervous system. The skin-electrode impedance was characterized in a healthy subject at varying frequencies over nine hours, showing a maximum impedance variation of 8% at the target stimulation frequency. Then, the performance of the proposed tattoo technology was compared to that of commercial Ag/AgCl electrodes through experimentation involving 12 healthy participants. The study found no statistically significant differences in key stimulation parameters (rheobase, p > 0.3, and chronaxie, p > 0.15) or in the sensory perceptions elicited by the two compared electrodes. Additionally, tattoo electrodes exhibited a lower operational impedance compared to commercial electrodes, highlighting their potential advantages for practical applications.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryTattooingTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAdultElectric ImpedanceElectrodesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultElectrical stimulationSomatosensory sensationsTattoo electrodes

Identifiers

PMID41145581
PMCPMC12559399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.