ArticleScientific reports2025
Synergistic effects of hybrid fibres and natural rubber latex on the thermal stability and mechanical properties of high-volume fly ash concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structures exposed to high temperatures must have enhanced thermal stability and mechanical properties. It is essential to utilise sustainable materials in the endeavour to achieve this objective. This study investigates the combined effects of natural rubber latex (NRL) and hybrid fibres in high-volume fly ash (HVFA) concrete. It introduces a novel approach of utilising NRL as a partial cement replacement at varying percentages of 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10%. Replacing cement with 2.5% NRL resulted in optimal performance. Higher percentages of NRL enhanced the concrete's workability, with 10% NRL producing a maximum slump of 54 mm. Adding 2.5% and 5% NRL significantly reduced water absorption by 12-18% compared to the control sample. Compressive strength decreased with higher NRL contents. The smallest reduction of 8% occurred with 2.5% replacement, and the highest loss of 55% was at 10% replacement. In contrast, tensile and flexural strengths improved by 14% and 31%, respectively, after 28 days of curing. The concrete with 2.5% NRL retained more strength at elevated temperatures, with a loss of strength of 20% at 600 °C compared to 25% for the control. The microstructural analysis revealed that the optimal NRL percentage resulted in a denser matrix, supporting the mechanical results. Generally, incorporating 2.5% NRL with hybrid fibres in HVFA concrete enhances durability and thermal resistance while maintaining satisfactory strength, offering a sustainable approach for high-performance applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.