ArticleScientific reports2025
Primary teachers' acceptance and sustained adoption of AI powered learner corpora for writing instruction through TAM and ECM perspectives.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reimagining writing assessment for the AI era: a systematic review on balancing AI support and authentic skill growth.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers significant potential to enhance writing instruction in primary education. However, its sustained adoption by English language teachers remains insufficiently understood. This study examines the factors influencing teachers' acceptance and continued use of AI-powered learner corpora, drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM). A structured questionnaire was administered to 355 primary school English teachers in Malaysia to assess variables related to external support (e.g., facilitating conditions, teacher-learner interaction), individual characteristics (e.g., perceived self-efficacy, expectancy effects, growth mindset, interest) and technology perceptions (e.g., perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, satisfaction, continuance intention). Data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, followed by Structural Equation Modeling. Results highlight perceived self-efficacy and interest as key predictors of perceived usefulness and continuance intention. They underscored the role of intrinsic motivation. In contrast, facilitating conditions did not significantly affect perceived ease of use, possibly due to increased digital familiarity among teachers. These findings validate the applicability of TAM and ECM in the primary education context and offer practical insights for designing AI tools that align with teachers' pedagogical needs, enhance user experience and support the sustainable integration of AI in writing instruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.