ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning applied to global scale species distribution models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From plankton to fish: 21st-century redistribution of marine biodiversity and the changing role of rare species.Science advances · 2026Article
- A high-resolution daily climate time series for Germany (1981-2100).Data in brief · 2026Article
- Human Activities and Climate Separately Influence the Global Dispersal and Colonization Potential ofBiology · 2026Article
- Predicting the impact of climate change on the suitable habitat of Populus qiongdaoensis in Hainan Island using MaxEnt modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Species Distribution Models (SDMs) are widely used in ecology to analyze historical and future patterns of marine species distributions. Given the growing impact of climate change, predicting potential shifts in species ranges has become a key challenge. In this study, we apply Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART), a non-parametric machine learning algorithm, to estimate and forecast the global distribution of marine turtle species under different climate change scenarios. We model both individual species and their combined functional group, assess their historical and future habitat suitability, and examine the contribution of key environmental predictors. To evaluate BART's performance, we conduct a simulation study under two contrasting distributional scenarios: a cosmopolitan and a persistent species. We also test the sensitivity of BART to pseudo-absence data and compare its performance with MaxEnt and Generalized Additive Models (GAMs). Results indicate that BART performs slightly better overall, particularly under pseudo-absence settings, showing higher accuracy and more stable sensitivity and specificity. These findings highlight BART as a reliable alternative for long-term, global-scale species distribution modeling in marine systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.