ArticleScientific data2025
From Footprints to Functions: A Comprehensive Global and Semantic Building Footprint Dataset.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Buildings play a critical role in understanding settlement patterns and are essential for crisis management, urban planning, energy efficiency, and multi-hazard risk assessment. To address the need for accessible global building data, we introduce a dataset containing 2.7 billion building footprints classified using the building taxonomy of the Global Earthquake Model. By conflating the AI-derived Google Open Buildings and the Microsoft Global ML Building Footprints datasets, and the crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap, we created the most detailed and extensive building dataset to date. This conflation helps balancing out the completeness bias in OpenStreetMap in which mapping is most complete in countries with high human developing index. We validated occupancy types and building height estimation using Kullback-Leibler divergence across specific cities, and through cadaster data from Slovenia and Greece, revealing that, while some misclassifications occur due to definitional differences or data limitations, the dataset overall provides reliable and valuable building information at global scale. Examples to use the data are to identify vulnerabilities of buildings for natural hazards or to model population distributions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.