Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145547›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

From Footprints to Functions: A Comprehensive Global and Semantic Building Footprint Dataset.

Laurens J N Oostwegel, Danijel Schorlemmer, Philippe Guéguen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laurens J N OostwegelSection Dynamic Hazard and Earthquake Risk, GFZ Helmholz Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany. laurens@gfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1320-5665
Danijel SchorlemmerSection Dynamic Hazard and Earthquake Risk, GFZ Helmholz Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany.
Philippe GuéguenISTerre, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont-Blanc, CNRS, IRD, Université Gustave Eiffel, CS40700 38058, Grenoble cedex 9, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6362-0694

Funding

European Commission (EC) GA 101058518European Commission (EC) GA 101073957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buildings play a critical role in understanding settlement patterns and are essential for crisis management, urban planning, energy efficiency, and multi-hazard risk assessment. To address the need for accessible global building data, we introduce a dataset containing 2.7 billion building footprints classified using the building taxonomy of the Global Earthquake Model. By conflating the AI-derived Google Open Buildings and the Microsoft Global ML Building Footprints datasets, and the crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap, we created the most detailed and extensive building dataset to date. This conflation helps balancing out the completeness bias in OpenStreetMap in which mapping is most complete in countries with high human developing index. We validated occupancy types and building height estimation using Kullback-Leibler divergence across specific cities, and through cadaster data from Slovenia and Greece, revealing that, while some misclassifications occur due to definitional differences or data limitations, the dataset overall provides reliable and valuable building information at global scale. Examples to use the data are to identify vulnerabilities of buildings for natural hazards or to model population distributions.

Identifiers

PMID41145547
PMCPMC12559435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.