ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning analysis of carbon rebound effect dynamics and drivers in Chinese prefecture-level cities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As global attention to climate change intensifies, China, as the world's largest energy consumer and carbon emitter, faces the dual challenge of improving energy efficiency while the carbon rebound effect (CRE) counteracts efforts to reduce emissions. Based on panel data from Chinese prefecture-level cities from 2010 to 2021. It combines multiple linear regression with machine learning (ensemble and deep learning) to uncover the nonlinear drivers of CRE. Machine learning models capture high-dimensional interactions and threshold effects. SHAP values and ALE plots are employed to quantify the impact pathways of key variables, overcoming the limitations of traditional models. This study employs multiple linear regression, ensemble learning, and deep learning methods, combined with interpretable SHAP values and ALE charts, to systematically identify the core driving mechanisms behind the carbon rebound effect. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows: (1) The CRE exhibits an overall "M"-shaped fluctuation trend, with a spatial pattern of "East > Central > West" and "North > South"; (2) Machine learning models accurately identify DEI, HTD, ER, Water, and UIS2 as the key drivers of CRE. These factors also exhibit significant and consistent threshold effects. This study provides a scientific basis for the formulation of differentiated ecological policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.