ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2025
Refining mild asthma phenotyping with FeNO: a population-based evaluation.
Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Association between combined allergic rhinitis and asthma syndrome in children and nitric oxide: mechanisms, clinical significance, and research progress.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Differences in Type 2 Phenotype and Clinical Characteristics of Adult Asthma Patients with Different Severity, Across GINA Step 1 to 5 Asthma.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The utility of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) was evaluated alongside blood eosinophils in phenotyping mild asthma. Inclusion of FeNO improved classification accuracy and calibration in an adapted ISAR-based model; however, its predictive improvement was modest and its susceptibility to transient elevations suggests limited added value for routine clinical classification. Simplified algorithms may offer more accurate phenotyping in population-based settings with real-world constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.