Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145468›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Temporal fingerprints for identity matching across fully encrypted domains.

Shahar Somin, Keeley Erhardt, Tom Cohen, Jeremy Kepner, Alex 'Sandy' Pentland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shahar SominMIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. shaharso@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2400-9068
Keeley Erhardt *MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tom Cohen *MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jeremy KepnerMIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alex 'Sandy' PentlandMIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the digital age, coordinated inauthentic behavior threatens societal stability, markets, and security. Advances in generative AI amplify these threats, enabling effortless content creation, amplifying actors' influence. Detection is hindered by cross-domain activity, where pseudonymous profiles operate across encrypted platforms, and by privacy constraints limiting content analysis. In this study, we propose a robust and scalable cross-domain identity matching framework, based on bursty dynamics, independent of content or interaction data. It outperforms state-of-the-art temporal and structural approaches, remains resilient to incomplete data, and correctly identifies 35% of profiles after 52 weeks. It scales effectively, attaining AUC 0.78 when matching identities across 500 marketplaces with over 250k daily traders. By framing identity matching within the "network of networks" perspective, we demonstrate how coordinated behavior propagates across domains. This dual methodological and theoretical contribution paves the way for innovative strategies to combat digital threats in an increasingly complex and adversarial landscape.

Identifiers

PMID41145468
PMCPMC12559210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.