ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
High-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging for detecting cerebral venous thrombosis across various venous segments and disease stages.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sinus- and Sequence-Specific Diagnostic Performance of Routine Unenhanced Brain MRI in Dural Venous Sinus Thrombosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeWe aimed to compare the performance of susceptibility-weighted imaging and standard magnetic resonance imaging sequences for cerebral venous thrombosis in diverse venous segments and disease stages.Materials and methodsWe compared the sensitivity of susceptibility-weighted imaging, T1-weighted imaging, T2-weighted imaging, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery in detecting cerebral venous thrombosis across various venous segments and disease stages. Additionally, the sensitivity of susceptibility-weighted imaging was compared with that of magnetic resonance venography for identifying cerebral venous thrombosis in different venous segments.ResultsThe study cohort comprised 33 lesions in the acute stage, 37 in the subacute stage, and 17 in the chronic stage. Susceptibility-weighted imaging demonstrated superior sensitivity, with values reaching 94% in the acute stage and 88% in the chronic stage, significantly outperforming the other three magnetic resonance imaging sequences
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.