Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145424›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

PLM-interact: extending protein language models to predict protein-protein interactions.

Dan Liu, Francesca Young, Kieran D Lamb, Adalberto Claudio Quiros, Alexandrina Pancheva, Crispin J Miller, Craig Macdonald, David L Robertson, Ke Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Linear-time prediction of proteome-scale microbial protein interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Protein Language Models in Virology: A Review of Advances and Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Computational function prediction of bacteria and phage proteins.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dan LiuMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2407-2589
Francesca YoungMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Kieran D LambMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3011-5189
Adalberto Claudio QuirosSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Alexandrina PanchevaCancer Research UK Scotland Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Crispin J MillerSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4341-1283
Craig MacdonaldSchool of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. craig.macdonald@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3143-279X
David L RobertsonMRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom. david.l.robertson@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6338-0221
Ke YuanSchool of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. ke.yuan@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2318-1460

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) DRCMDP-Nov23/100010Cancer Research UK (CRUK) EDDPGM-Nov21\100001EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (H2020 Excellent Science - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions) 955974EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101016851Prostate Cancer UK MA-TIA22-001RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/V016067/1RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00034/5RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00034/6RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/V01157X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational prediction of protein structure from amino acid sequence alone has been achieved with unprecedented accuracy, yet the prediction of protein-protein interactions remains a challenge. Here, we assess the ability of protein language models (PLMs), routinely applied to protein folding, to be retrained for protein-protein interaction prediction. Existing models that exploit PLMs use a pre-trained PLM feature set, ignoring that the proteins are physically interacting. We propose PLM-interact, which goes beyond single proteins by jointly encoding protein pairs to learn their relationships, analogous to the next-sentence prediction task from natural language processing. This approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in a widely adopted cross-species protein-protein interaction prediction benchmark: trained on human data and tested on mouse, fly, worm, E. coli and yeast. In addition, we develop a fine-tuning method for PLM-interact to detect mutation effects on interactions. Finally, we report that the model outperforms existing approaches in predicting virus-host interaction at the protein level. Our work demonstrates that large language models can be extended to learn the intricate relationships among biomolecules from their sequences alone.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProtein Interaction MappingProteinsAnimalsEscherichia coliHumansMiceNatural Language ProcessingProtein BindingProtein FoldingProteins

Identifiers

PMID41145424
PMCPMC12559430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.