Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145412›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Mode of action of a DCAF16-recruiting targeted glue that can selectively degrade BRD9.

Scott J Hughes, Wojciech J Stec, Colin T R Davies, David McGarry, Alicia Williams, Marta Carrara, Ivan Del Barco Barrantes, Rebecca Harris, Anna Tasegian, Dominic D G Owens and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A tail of two ligases.Nature chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Covalent Reprogramming of Kinase Binders to Modulate Protein Abundance.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Covalent Reprogramming of Kinase Binders to Modulate Protein Homeostasis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Scott J HughesAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Wojciech J StecAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Colin T R DaviesAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3156-543X
David McGarryAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7087-0584
Alicia WilliamsAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Marta CarraraAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Ivan Del Barco BarrantesAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Rebecca HarrisAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Anna TasegianAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6122-265X
Dominic D G OwensAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Alexander FawcettAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1880-3269
John HellicarAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Aleksandra AzevedoAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Gregor P MeierAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Andrew C RuncieAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Liliana GregerAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Martin O'RourkeAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Ian ChurcherAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Martin PassAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Giles A BrownAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
Alessio CiulliCentre for Targeted Protein Degradation, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8654-1670
Louise K ModisAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK. louise.modis@amphista.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3103-4089
Andrea TestaAmphista Therapeutics Ltd, Cambridge, UK. andrea.testa5@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8973-9711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular glue degraders for therapeutic target proteins are emerging as a strategy in drug discovery. Here, we modify a BRD9 ligand with specific chemical fragments to create degrader compounds that we call Targeted Glues. When bound to the target protein, these create an altered protein-ligand interface that is recognised by a ligase. This interaction between the target and the E3 ligase leads to protein degradation and is stabilised by a reversible covalent interaction between our molecule and a specific cysteine in the ligase. By screening a library of BRD9 targeted compounds we discover AMPTX1, a potent selective and reversibly covalent BRD9 degrader. In cells, AMPTX-1 selectively recruits the E3 ligase, DCAF16, to BRD9 and drives BRD9 degradation, as demonstrated by co-immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry. BRD9 degradation is primarily dependent on the engagement of the surface Cys58 of DCAF16; the formation of a covalent adduct to DCAF16 is facilitated by ternary complex formation with BRD9. BRD9 degradation is also achieved in vivo with AMPTX-1 in a mouse xenograft model after oral dosing due to the drug-like, orally bioavailable properties of the compound. This supports the concept that covalent recruitment of DCAF16 is a viable approach in the development of therapeutic degraders.

Indexed as

Transcription FactorsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesAnimalsBromodomain Containing ProteinsHEK293 CellsHumansLigandsMiceProtein BindingProteolysisBRD9 protein, humanBromodomain Containing ProteinsLigandsTranscription FactorsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID41145412
PMCPMC12559202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.