Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41145397›Full record

SynthesisJournal of advanced nursing2026

THE Effect of Mentoring Programmes on Newly Graduated Nurses' Retention and Turnover: An Umbrella Review.

Elina Södergård, Jonna Juntunen, Heli-Maria Kuivila, Marco Tomietto, Kristina Mikkonen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elina SödergårdResearch Unit of Health Science and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Jonna JuntunenResearch Unit of Health Science and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3195-8265
Heli-Maria KuivilaResearch Unit of Health Science and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8639-7640
Marco TomiettoDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3813-1490
Kristina MikkonenResearch Unit of Health Science and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4355-3428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo summarise the effect of mentoring within mentoring programmes on the retention and turnover of newly graduated nurses in healthcare settings.

designAn umbrella review.

methodsTwo independent reviewers screened the titles, abstracts and full texts for eligibility and critically appraised the included reviews using the JBI critical appraisal. The findings were tabulated and synthesised. DATA SOURCES: The search was conducted in five electronic databases (CINAHL, OvidMedline, ProQuest, Scopus, Cochrane and Medic) in November 2023.

resultsOut of 450 Papers, 13 systematic and integrative reviews were included. Thirteen mentoring programmes were identified and categorised into three groups based on their content: didactic mentoring programmes, interaction-based mentoring programmes and combined mentoring programmes. Across these programme types, retention among newly graduated nurses ranged from 72% to 100% at the 1-year mark and 70% to 98% at 2 years. Turnover rates showed consistent reductions, with post-intervention rates ranging from 3.5% to 20% compared to pre-intervention rates of up to 50%. Several studies reported statistically significant improvements in retention and turnover, particularly in programmes integrating structured education and preceptorship models.

conclusionsSeveral different mentoring programmes have been developed to support the transition of newly graduated nurses. Mentoring programmes that provide ongoing support and structured guidance increase retention and reduce turnover among newly graduated nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Effective mentoring programmes are key to ensuring high-quality patient care and a sufficient supply of qualified nurses in the future. IMPACT: The findings can provide information for developing transition support and mentoring programmes for newly graduated nurses. REPORTING

methodThis umbrella review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution. TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The umbrella review protocol was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42023478044.

Indexed as

MentoringMentorsPersonnel TurnoverHumansmentoringmentoring programmenewly graduated nurseretentiontransition programmeturnover

Identifiers

PMID41145397
PMCPMC13267445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.