ArticleBMJ open2025
Clinician experiences in a DBT-informed consultation group embedded within a US academic primary care clinic: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04489693 (Care in the Comprehensive Care Physician), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Care in the Comprehensive Care Physician (CCP) Program vs. Care in the Comprehensive Care Community and Culture Program (C4P) vs. Care in the Traditional Care
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTraditional wellness programming focuses on bringing together individual clinicians during personal time for resources and skill building, without a focus on skill building in the contexts and teams they are embedded in daily. We developed a dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT)-informed consultation group, 'Complex Care Rounds' (CCR), implemented within the usual workflow of a primary care clinic. The goal of CCR was to facilitate interprofessional team communication and enhance clinician motivation and efficacy, while simultaneously addressing medical and social needs of patients. During the twice-weekly group, team members provided validation and shared feedback while acknowledging the needs of the clinician and patient. The aim of this study was to explore clinician perspectives on participation in CCR and to create a conceptual model to understand CCR's influence on individual team members as well as team dynamics.
settingThe research was completed at the Comprehensive Care Programme, a primary care programme for patients with Medicare insurance at high risk of hospitalisation at an academic institution in Chicago, Illinois, USA. STUDY
designThis was a qualitative research study examining reflective essays written by participants on how participating in CCR has impacted them. Template analysis, a form of thematic analysis, was applied to code and organise themes. STUDY
participantsParticipants included 12 clinical team members (physicians, nurses, social service team members) and 7 trainees (AmeriCorps members, medical students) from the Comprehensive Care Programme.
resultsWe found that CCR's
conclusionsDBT-informed consultation groups embedded within a clinical practice have the potential to promote a practice and culture of interprofessional team members tending to self and others, while also building one's own skills and capacity to care for complex patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical trial: NCT04489693; Pre-results".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.