Observational studyBMJ open2025
Examining the impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on equitable access to emergency care across Alberta demographic groups: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a notable decline in emergency department (ED) usage in many jurisdictions. This study assessed changes in ED use during this period and explored how the pandemic may have aggravated existing healthcare access inequities.
objectivesOur primary objective was to assess pandemic-related changes to ED visits and emergency hospitalisations for distinct demographic groups.
designWe conducted a retrospective observational study using population-based provincial administrative data.
settingWe analysed data from all the 109 EDs and urgent care centres in Alberta, Canada, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (15 March 2020 to 30 June 2020), and during the corresponding (control) period 1 year earlier. We conducted subgroup analyses by age, First Nations status, sex, location and material deprivation. We repeated all analyses for pre-selected life-threatening emergency diagnoses. POPULATIONS: We examined outcomes for a priori subgroups, including female and 'other' sex patients, paediatric patients (age 0-17 years), seniors (age 65 years and older), patients living in remote areas (greater than 200 km from an urban centre), First Nations members and patients living in materially deprived postal codes falling into the two most deprived Pampalon Index quintiles. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were number of ED visits, number of ED visits with admission to hospital and number of ED visits resulting in patient death in the ED. A secondary outcome was change in ED use for life-threatening diagnoses (eg, cardiac conditions and hepatic disease).
resultsED visits in the COVID-19 period decreased by 34% (Poisson means test p <0.001) and hospitalisations decreased by 15% (p <0.001) compared with 2019. Multivariable models showed an average decrease of 79.9 (p <0.001) ED visits, and 7.7 (p <0.001) fewer average admissions per facility for the COVID-19 period (vs 2019) in our 'baseline' group (non-First Nations, male, adult and metropolitan residents who were not materially deprived). First Nations patients, seniors and remote residents experienced smaller declines in ED visits compared with the baseline group. Females, seniors and children experienced larger reductions in emergency admissions, while First Nations patients had smaller reductions.
conclusionReductions in critical emergency care and emergency hospital admissions were unequally distributed across demographic groups during the COVID-19 period. Study methods could be used to monitor and support equitable access to emergency care among distinct populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.