ArticleGenetics2026
Single-cell transcriptome defines cell-type repertoire of adult Daphnia magna.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary Analysis of Gene-Expression Localization in the Model Crustacean, Daphnia pulex.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary Analysis of Gene-expression Localization in the Model Crustacean,bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detailed knowledge of transcriptional responses to environmental cues or developmental stimuli requires single-cell resolution. We performed 2 single-cell RNAseq experiments of adult females and males of Daphnia magna, a freshwater plankton crustacean which is both a classic and emerging new model for eco-physiology, toxicology, and evolutionary genomics. We were able to identify >25 distinct cell types about half of which could be functionally annotated. First, we identified ovaries- and testis-related cell types by focusing on female- and male-specific clusters. Second, we compared markers between cell clusters and bulk RNAseq data on transcriptional profiles of early embryos, circulating hemocytes, midgut, heads (containing brain, eyes, muscles, and hepatic caeca), antennae II, and carapace. Finally, we compared transcriptional profiles of Daphnia cell clusters with orthologous markers of 200+ cell types annotated in Drosophila cell atlas. This allowed us to recognize striated myocytes, enterocytes, cuticular cells, as well as 9 different neuron types, including photoreceptors. Several well-defined clusters showed a significant enrichment in markers of both hemocytes and either fat body, or ovaries, or certain neuron types of Drosophila, but not with bulk RNAseq data from circulating hemocytes. This allowed us to hypothesize the existence of noncirculating, fat body-, ovary-, or neuron-associated populations of hemocytes in Daphnia. The circulating hemocytes express numerous cuticular proteins suggesting their role, in addition to macrophagy, in wound repair. Our data will be useful as a baseline resource for researchers using Daphnia to answer questions in ecophysiology, toxicology and biology of adaptation to changing environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.