Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144827›Full record

Trial reportActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026

Haemodynamic Changes After Prophylactic Doses of Ephedrine, Phenylephrine, Norepinephrine Versus Placebo During Induction of General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Trial.

Gunnar Helge Sjøen, Tor Hugo Hauge, Ragnhild Sørum Falk, Tor Inge Tønnessen, Eldrid Langesæter

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03864094 ("Haemodynamic Stability During Induction of General Anesthesia With Propofol and Remifentanil), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03864094 phase4completednot on this map

"Haemodynamic Stability During Induction of General Anesthesia With Propofol and Remifentanil: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study Comparing Equipotent Prophylactic Doses of Ephedrine, Phenylephrine, Norepinephrine vs Placebo."

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelse FonnaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled128ConditionsHemodynamic Instability, Anesthesia, General, Anesthesia, IntravenousArmsEphedrine, Phenylephrine, Norepinephrine, Sodium chloride, Propofol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gunnar Helge SjøenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Fonna Hospital Trust, Haugesund, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5343-3975
Tor Hugo HaugeNorwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries, Oslo, Norway.
Ragnhild Sørum FalkOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8398-3492
Tor Inge TønnessenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3511-5815
Eldrid LangesæterDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Western Norway Regional Health Authority
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEphedrine, phenylephrine, and norepinephrine are commonly used to manage hypotension during the induction of anaesthesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether prophylactic administration of assumed equipotent doses of these vasopressors could maintain systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) and heart rate (HR) within 80% of baseline for the first 5 min following induction of anaesthesia.

methodsThis randomised, double-blind, dose-controlled study was conducted at the Day Surgery Unit of Haugesund Hospital, Norway. One hundred and twenty-eight healthy women scheduled for gynaecological surgery were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive prophylactic administration of ephedrine (0.1 mg/kg), phenylephrine (1 μg/kg), norepinephrine (0.1 mg/kg), or placebo (sodium chloride 9 mg/mL) at a volume of 0.1 mL/kg. Anaesthesia was induced using target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and remifentanil. The initial 2.5 min constituted a sedation phase, after which the targets of propofol and remifentanil were increased, and the assigned vasopressor was administered. Beat-to-beat haemodynamic monitoring was performed using the LiDCOplus system. The primary outcome variables were the maximal decrease in SAP and HR within 5 min following bolus administration. Secondary outcome measures included changes in stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR).

resultsThe absolute changes in SAP (mean ± standard deviation) following vasopressor administration were -27 ± 8.9 (ephedrine), -40 ± 11 (phenylephrine), -41 ± 13 (norepinephrine), and -42 ± 10 (placebo) mmHg. The differences (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the maximal SAP change between placebo and the vasopressors were as follows: ephedrine, -15 (-22, -9.9) mmHg; phenylephrine, -2.3 (-8.8, 4.2) mmHg; and norepinephrine, -1.7 (-8.3, 4.9) mmHg. Relative reductions in SAP from baseline to minimum values were -20% for ephedrine, -30% for phenylephrine, -30% for norepinephrine, and -32% for placebo. The absolute changes (median, interquartile range) in HR with ephedrine, phenylephrine, norepinephrine, and placebo were -10 (-6.2 to -18), -19 (-17 to -26), -23 (-20 to -33), and -15 (-9.5 to -21) bpm, respectively. Relative changes from baseline to minimum values in HR were -17% for ephedrine, -30% for phenylephrine, -37% for norepinephrine, and -22% for placebo. The differences in SV change between groups were small. CO was best preserved with ephedrine (-22% ± 11%), while phenylephrine and norepinephrine were associated with greater reductions (-38% ± 7.8% and -42% ± 9.8%, respectively). SVR increased most markedly in the norepinephrine group, followed by phenylephrine, with the smallest increase observed in the ephedrine group.

conclusionProphylactic administration of ephedrine effectively maintained SAP, HR, and CO within the first 5 min following bolus injection at induction with propofol and remifentanil. In contrast, bolus administration of norepinephrine and phenylephrine demonstrated a short duration of action, with SAP comparable to placebo at 5 min. Based on these findings, prophylactic administration of a bolus ephedrine is recommended, whereas prophylactic phenylephrine or norepinephrine injections may not be clinically preferable for bolus use in this context.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03864094, March 6, 2019 This trial assessed circulatory responses to three different commonly used vasoactive support (vasopressor) drugs given as a single bolus together anesthetic induction propofol and remifentanil, and this in a cardiovascularly healthy adult surgical cohort. Results demonstrated that pharmacodynamic patterns with the three different test drugs, along with a no-prophylactic vasopressor comparitor. Findings showed a favorable profile for ephedrine compared to phenylephrine or noradrenaline if choosing to give a vasopressor in this way.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralEphedrineHemodynamicsNorepinephrinePhenylephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAdultBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHumansHypotensionMiddle AgedYoung AdultEphedrineNorepinephrinePhenylephrineVasoconstrictor Agentsephedrinehaemodynamicsnorepinephrinephenylephrinephysiological effects of drugspropofolremifentanil

Identifiers

PMID41144827
PMCPMC12558648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.