ArticleBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Practical Exploration of Medical Students' Curriculum Education Model in the Context of New Medical Science-Taking Biochemistry and Molecular Biology as an Example.
Article in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Practical Exploration of Medical Students' Curriculum Education Model in the Context of New Medical Science-Taking Biochemistry and Molecular Biology as an Example.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates a reformed teaching model for biochemistry and molecular biology under New Medical Science, comparing traditional methods with a blend of online-offline learning, flipped classrooms, and humanistic integration. A quasi-experiment with 351 medical students showed that the experimental group (stomatology) outperformed the control (clinical medicine) in exam scores: 2020-2022 cohorts had mean score increases of 2.76-3.92 (all p < 0.05). Satisfaction surveys indicated 93.2% approved the evaluation mechanism, 94.9% linked biochemistry cases to ethical reflection, and 64.4% reported heightened research motivation. The model enhances academic performance and cultivates comprehensive competencies, meeting modern medical education needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.