ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Objective clinical tests to inform decision-making prior to return to sport in athletes with shoulder instability: A scoping review.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of triple-strand braid vs conventional quad-strand hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Objective clinical tests to inform decision-making prior to return to sport in athletes with shoulder instability: A scoping review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis review systematically maps the existing research on objective return to sport criteria for shoulder injuries, with a focus on clinical tests that inform decision-making.
methodsA scoping review was performed. The following databases were searched from inception up to July 2025: Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PEDRo, Cinahl and AMED. All studies, regardless of design, which assessed any kind of shoulder function with regard to return to sport decision-making in individuals participating in sports and presented with a shoulder injury were included. The result was qualitatively presented in free text, tables and figures.
resultsEleven studies were identified that reported objective shoulder tests prior to return to sport in athletes after shoulder instability surgery. The tests evaluated various parameters, including range of motion, muscular strength, muscular endurance, power, plyometrics, movement quality and trunk control. The passing rates of isokinetic shoulder strength tests ranged from 40% to 70%, the isometric shoulder strength tests from 28% to 100%, for shoulder endurance tests from 70% to 81% and shoulder performance tests from 29% to 100%. These assessments were conducted within a time frame of 4-21 months following surgery. The rate of subsequent shoulder instability or re-dislocation ranged from 5% to 10% after returning to sport.
conclusionsPassing rates for objective shoulder tests, including muscular strength and endurance, as well as performance tests, varied widely, with re-dislocation rates between 5% and 10% after returning to sport. However, the predominance of case series limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of these tests in reducing the risk of subsequent shoulder instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, scoping review of level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.