Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144697›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026

Jump performance and hop function, kinesiophobia and return to sports are important prognostic factors for a subsequent injury after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 2-year follow-up cohort study.

Daniel Niederer, Matthias Keller, Wolf Petersen, Karl-Friedrich Schüttler, Turgay Efe, Tobias Engeroff, David A Groneberg, Christine Heinrich, Michael Behringer, Natalie Mengis and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Daniel NiedererInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7690-5418
Matthias KellerOSINSTITUT Ortho & Sport, Munich, Germany.
Wolf PetersenKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Berlin, Germany.
Karl-Friedrich SchüttlerOrthopaedicum Lich Giessen, Gießen, Germany.
Turgay EfeOrthopaedicum Lich Giessen, Gießen, Germany.
Tobias EngeroffInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
David A GronebergInstitute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christine HeinrichDepartment of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Michael BehringerDepartment of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Natalie MengisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland, Basel, Switzerland.
Andree EllermannArcus Sportklinik, Pforzheim, Germany.
Daniel GuentherDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery, and Sports Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Georg BrandlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery II, Herz-Jesu Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria.
Björn DrewsSt. Vinzenz Clinic Allgäu, Pfronten, Germany.
Julian MehlDepartment for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Raymond BestDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Sportklinik Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Lucia PinggeraDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Sportklinik Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Christian SchoeppDepartment of Arthroscopic Surgery, Sports Traumatology and Sports Medicine, BG Klinikum Duisburg gGmbH, Duisburg, Germany.
Matthias KrauseDepartment of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas SteinDepartment of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

German Knee Society (DKG)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFinding prognostic factors for a subsequent injury after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

methodsWe re-analysed the data of two intervention studies on adults with a hamstrings or quadriceps tendon ACL reconstruction. All participants were prospectively monitored for 24 months. At the end of the individual postsurgery rehabilitation, numerous self-reported and objective functional outcomes were quantified, all potential secondary injuries (primary outcome was the occurrence of secondary ipsi- or contralateral ACL injuries) and all rehabilitation and training measures were prospectively monitored. The association of potential factors with a secondary injury risk was determined using logistic mixed models.

resultsWe included 148 participants (mean age 25.3 years [standard deviation 5.1 years], 63 females). Eight participants had a subsequent ACL injury, among them seven ispilateral and one contralateral side ACL rupture. The final model for the likelihood of a subsequent ACL injury led to a sensitivity (correctly classified participants who had a subsequent ACL injury) of 83.3% and to a specificity (correctly identified participants without who did not have a subsequent ACL injury) of 100% (n = 93). The main contributing factors to subsequent ACL or any subsequent other injuries were: higher kinesiophobia values (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-3.4), higher knee loading levels during activity (Tegner activity scale, OR = 29, 95% CI: 1.1-791), lower performance levels at the Balance front hop (OR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.03-0.52), and higher dynamic valgus (knee separation distance in the frontal plane) during the landing of a drop jump landing (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.98).

conclusionMost of the predictive factors for a second subsequent injury after an ACL reconstruction are modifiable by adequate training and rehabilitation measures. The modification of these factors might decrease the secondary risk of injury risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, a prospective cohort study.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionReturn to SportAdultAthletic InjuriesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKinesiophobiaMalePrognosisProspective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultACLdeterminatesfunctional capacitypredictionreturn to sportsRTS

Identifiers

PMID41144697
PMCPMC12747599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.