ArticleAlcohol, clinical & experimental research2025
How much is enough? Assessing 30- versus 60-day Timeline Followback stability in youth alcohol use patterns.
Article in Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing Past-Month Substance Use in Emerging Adults: Consistency Between Timeline Followback and Monthly Surveys Varies by Substance.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2026Article
- Age- and alcohol-related differences in adolescent neurometabolite levels.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026Article
- How much is enough? Assessing 30- versus 60-day Timeline Followback stability in youth alcohol use patterns.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe variability of youth alcohol use is thought to necessitate longer Timeline Followback (TLFB) reporting windows to accurately capture alcohol use patterns. However, longer TLFB windows can increase burden for participants and study staff. This study assessed youth alcohol use patterns across two different 30-day periods (TLFB days 1-30 and 31-60) to inform future research protocols.
methodsParticipants (N = 481 with 504 visits, ages: 15-25) completed a shared intake to determine eligibility for numerous substance-related studies. Alcohol consumption over the past 60 days was assessed using a modified TLFB that recorded total number of drinks, average drinks per day, average drinks per drinking day (DPDD), total number of drinking days, maximum number of drinks in a single day, and total number of binge drinking days (4+ drinks for females, 5+ drinks for males). TLFB data were divided into two 30-day periods: the most recent (Days 1-30) and the more distal (Days 31-60). Analyses were conducted overall and within subgroups by sex, age (under 21 or 21+), presence of alcohol use disorder (AUD), and other substance use. Alcohol use patterns were assessed using Spearman correlations, Wilcoxon signed rank tests, and intraclass correlations (ICC) for test-retest reliability.
resultsAll alcohol outcomes were significantly correlated between reporting windows (p's < 0.001). Alcohol use was significantly higher during the more recent reporting window (TLFB Days 1-30; p's < 0.05), except for DPDD (p = 0.58). Overall, the differences between reporting windows were small (on average, less than three total drinks and <1 drinking day or binge drinking day) and suggested clinically similar use patterns. The ICC values suggest moderate-to-good stability between reporting windows. Similar patterns were noted in each subgroup analysis.
conclusionsA 30-day TLFB window appears sufficient for youth alcohol use assessment, providing comparable and agreeable self-reported alcohol use patterns, with reduced burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.