Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144668›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Geochronology of the Early Triassic based on coupled Bayesian zircon eruption age and Bayesian age-depth models.

Xu Dai, Maria Ovtcharova, Joshua H F L Davies, Huyue Song, Xiaokang Liu, Zhiwei Yuan, Yiran Cao, Ruoyu Bai, Daoliang Chu, Jacopo Dal Corso and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xu DaiState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1794-7351
Maria OvtcharovaDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva CH-1205, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8079-5189
Joshua H F L DaviesDépartement des sciences de la Terre et de l'atmosphère/Geotop, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal H2X 3Y7, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8668-6012
Huyue SongState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
Xiaokang LiuState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4138-3138
Zhiwei YuanState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3028-1467
Yiran CaoState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3051-6847
Ruoyu BaiCollege of Environment and Biological Engineering, Henan University of Engineering, Zhengzhou 451191, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1541-2633
Daoliang ChuState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
Jacopo Dal CorsoState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
Arnaud BrayardUniversité Bourgogne Europe, CNRS, Biogéosciences, UMR 62826, Dijon 21000, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1304-6553
Shouyi JiangState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
Luyi MiaoState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
Yong DuState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
Haijun SongState Key Laboratory of Geomicrobiology and Environmental Changes, School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.

Funding

"CUG Scholar" Scientific Research Funds at China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) 2023134Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) CUG240604MOST | National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 42402003National Natural Foundation of China 42325202OSU THETA SROState Key R&D project of China 2023YFF0804000Universite Bourgogne Europe BQR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise and accurate geochronology is essential for reconstructing Earth's history and coeval life evolution. The Early Triassic was a critical time interval following the greatest Phanerozoic mass extinction, recording remarkable biotic changes and a series of environmental and climatic upheavals. Its geochronology remains, however, rather poorly constrained and highly debated. Here, we present high-precision zircon U-Pb dates for four ash beds from the Induan in South China, along with carbon isotope data. We use coupled Bayesian eruption age and Bayesian age-depth models to estimate the ages of our ash beds and to reinterpret the published ages of 25 ash beds from other four sections in South China, as well as to construct new age-depth models for each section. Our new age-depth models, integrated with biostratigraphic data, yield new age estimates for the following boundaries: Permian-Triassic (~251.867 Ma), Griesbachian-Dienerian (~251.562 Ma), Induan-Olenekian (~250.626 Ma), Smithian-Spathian (~249.236 Ma), and Olenekian-Anisian (~246.979 Ma). Calibration of the Early Triassic carbon isotopic record using the new age model reveals highly variable rates of individual carbon isotope excursions. For instance, the negative excursion across the Permian-Triassic boundary exhibits a rate of approximately -11.7‰ per 100 kyr-nearly seven times faster than the early Smithian negative excursion rate of approximately -1.7‰ per 100 kyr. This refined age model also provides a robust temporal framework to evaluate the tempo of biotic evolution in the aftermath of the Permian-Triassic mass extinction.

Indexed as

biotic recoverycarbon isotope excursionsgeological time scalestratigraphyU-Pb geochronology

Identifiers

PMID41144668
PMCPMC12595414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.