ReviewDevelopmental neuroscience2025
Small for Gestational Age and Motor Development in Children: A Narrative Review of Risk Factors, Brain Mechanisms, and Early Interventions.
Review in Developmental neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall for gestational age (SGA) infants face a heightened risk of motor delays that can persist into childhood, affecting cognitive and language development. Early identification and intervention are critical for better long-term outcomes. SUMMARY: This narrative review highlights evidence on motor development in SGA children, focusing on risk factors, neurobiological mechanisms, and early interventions. Motor delays in SGA infants correlate with lower birth weight, shorter gestation, adverse intrauterine conditions, and perinatal complications. Structural brain changes, especially in white matter and cerebellum, along with prenatal and postnatal inflammation, contribute to these deficits. Nutritional support, physical therapy, and family-based stimulation initiated in the first 2 years show promise for improving motor outcomes. KEY MESSAGES: SGA children are at high risk for motor developmental disorders. A comprehensive early intervention approach targeting nutrition, neurodevelopment, and family support is essential. Future research should aim to clarify mechanisms and optimize intervention timing and strategies to enhance long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.