Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41144572›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Cohort-resolved excess mortality in Germany (2000-2024): Patterns and implications for the SARS-CoV-2 era.

Robert Rockenfeller, Michael Günther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert RockenfellerMathematical Institute, University of Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-5025
Michael GüntherComputational Biophysics and Biorobotics, Institute for Modelling and Simulation of Biomechanical Systems, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on mortality requires more than aggregate statistics. While whole-population indicators have informed policy, they risk concealing subgroup-specific patterns. We analysed all-cause mortality in Germany from 2000 to 2024 using a weekly, cohort-resolved framework across 15 age groups to detect excess and under-mortality before, during, and after the pandemic. Expected mortality was modelled using exponential trends from two decades of pre-pandemic data. Deviations from expectation were quantified as normalised excess all-cause mortality rates (NEAMR), enabling the identification of significant, age-specific anomalies. We found sustained NEAMR in adults aged 75-79 and 35-49 from late 2021 through 2024-patterns absent in whole-population trends. Conversely, cohorts aged 30-34 and 55-59 showed persistent under-mortality. Earlier excess peaks in older cohorts (e.g., 85-89 in 2003, 95+ in 2013) suggest generational vulnerabilities potentially linked to early-life adversity. Cross-correlation analyses indicate that associations between NEAMR and SARS-CoV-2 mRNA injection rates diverge from expected protective patterns in most age cohorts, especially during the 2021 'alpha-to-delta' transition. These findings highlight the need for further hypothesis-driven investigations as well as a high-resolution mortality surveillance. Cohort-resolved analysis reveals NEAMR signals that aggregate data obscure, offering a more accurate assessment of public health outcomes across demographic groups.

Indexed as

COVID-19MortalityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansInfantMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41144572
PMCPMC12558607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.