ArticlePloS one2025
Association between no-shows to scheduled clinic appointments and 30-day risk of overdose in patients prescribed methadone for opioid use disorder.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of synthetic opiates and non-opiate sedatives into the illicit drug market has increased overdose risk for individuals who use opiates and other drugs. The ongoing risk of overdose for patients receiving methadone as a medication for opioid use disorder in the context of this more potent and less predictable drug supply is not well characterized. Additionally, little research has explored whether commonly available clinical data (including data available even in low resource settings) can predict near-term acute overdose in patients prescribed methadone for opioid use disorder.
objectiveTo determine whether the number of recent no-shows to scheduled clinic appointments in the past 30 days is associated with 30-day overdose risk among patients enrolled in one Opioid Treatment Program who are prescribed methadone for opioid use disorder.
methodsWe analyzed clinical records from 1,049 patients in an opioid treatment program (May 2020-April 2024), and for each patient-day, counted the number of no-shows to scheduled clinic appointments (not methadone administrations) in the previous 30 days. Associations between the number of standardized no-shows in the past 30 days and overdose in the subsequent 30 days were analyzed with logistic regression via generalized linear model controlling for temporal and patient-specific variables. Goodness of fit was assessed with marginal R2 and a simulation-based approach designed for multilevel models.
resultsThe sample included 56 overdoses with an average of 0.919 no-shows in the last 30 days (std. dev 1.37). The z-standardized number of no-shows to scheduled appointments in the past 30 days was both statistically and clinically significantly associated with risk of overdose in the next 30 days adjusting for study month and season (odds ratio 1.18 [95% CI 1.13-1.23] P < 0.001), as well as adjusting for demographics and overdoses during study period (odds ratio 1.28 [95% CI 1.22-1.34] P < 0.001), and a marginal R2 of 0.04. Model diagnostics revealed adequate fit using a generalized additive model, with results virtually unchanged from the generalized linear model.
conclusionNo-shows to scheduled clinic appointments in the past 30 days are significantly associated with overdose risk in the next 30 days with a linear relationship among patients receiving methadone in a single opioid treatment program. Population-specific acute risk prediction tools could help clinicians prioritize resources for timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.