ArticlePloS one2025
Citation proximus: The role of social and semantic ties on citations.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite being considered as key indicators of research impact, citations are shaped by factors beyond intrinsic research quality-such as including prestige, social networks, and research topics. While the Matthew Effect explains how prestige accumulates, our study contextualizes this by showing that other mechanisms also play a role in citation accumulation. Analyzing a large dataset of U.S. economic (N = 43,467) and their citation linkages (N = 264,436), we find that close ties in the collaboration network are the strongest predictor of citations, closely followed by semantic similarity between citing and cited papers. This suggests that citations are not only driven by prestige but are strongly affected by f social networks and intellectual proximity. Prestige remains an important factor affecting citations for highly cited papers, but for most papers, proximity-both social and semantic-plays a more significant role. These findings redirect focus from extreme cases of highly cited research to the overall citation distribution, which influences most scientists' career paths and knowledge production. Recognizing the diverse factors influencing citations is critical for science policy and for developing a reward system of science that is fairer and reflects a diversity of contributions to science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.