ArticlePloS one2025
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of steroid versus methotrexate as first-line monotherapy in the management of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a rare inflammatory breast disease affecting mainly young to middle aged women. Its aetiology is idiopathic and poorly understood, but recent evidence supports its autoimmunity pathogenesis. This pathogenesis supports the current first line treatment involving steroid monotherapy or steroid combination therapy with methotrexate, however, there is no single well-established treatment protocol that has been shown to most effectively cure the disease. Thus, this prospective, open, two arm randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of steroid versus methotrexate therapy in the treatment of IGM patients was developed, with the hypothesis that methotrexate has a higher 6-months clinical complete response and radiologically complete response rate than steroid monotherapy.
methodsThis trial will be conducted at the Breast Care Center of the National University Hospital Singapore. To be eligible, patients must have undergone breast ultrasound, biopsy, and histologic diagnosis of IGM. Forty eligible patients between the ages 21-60 will be recruited obtaining informed consent. Baseline blood tests and imaging will be obtained during screening phase. Eligible patients after the screening phase will be randomised to either oral corticosteroid or methotrexate group. Treatment phase commences in which patients in both arms will receive either oral corticosteroid or oral methotrexate over 3 months, with follow-ups conducted at 6- and 12-months post randomisation. Safety measures including reporting of adverse events along the course of the trial will be observed. The primary outcome is 6-month complete clinical or radiological response rate, alongside time to cCR post randomization, treatment failure (TF) rate, and relapse rate (RR). Secondary outcomes include identification of drug adverse effect, frequency of surgical intervention, determination of potential biomarkers, and patient reported outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the ethics committee of the National University Singapore (DSRB reference number 2023/00773). Results of this trial will be shared and presented in local and international scientific conferences, and will be published in international journals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.