ArticlePloS one2025
Leveraging spatial data infrastructure for machine learning based building energy performance prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The calculation, management and maintenance of energy performance of buildings (EPBs) are significant in increasing energy efficiency in buildings and reducing greenhouse gas emissions since it is estimated that approximately one third of energy consumption is associated with buildings, and furthermore, three-quarters of the existing building stock is characterized by energy inefficiency. However, in many cases, EPBs are either not calculated or not integrated in a register within national spatial data infrastructure (NSDI). This complicates policy development and planning for both local and national governments, which may result in numerous complications. The objective of this paper is twofold: firstly, to design a building energy data model as an extension of NSDI in Türkiye and then implementing and populating it with real data taken from energy performance certificates from the Tuzla District in Istanbul; and secondly, to develop energy performance prediction models with Machine Learning (ML) algorithms (i.e., Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) in order to estimate the overall performance scores of the buildings. The model's findings demonstrated robust predictive accuracy, achieving an R² of 0.818 (XGBoost) and performance metrics of RMSE = 5.153, MAE = 2.886, and MAPE = 3.369. These results substantiate the model's reliability in estimating targeted building energy performance scores. These predictions can be used to provide a comprehensive overview of districts in terms of EPB and inform the development of road maps at the district, city, or national level. Furthermore, the predictions can support the development of EPB-related legislation, facilitate the design of incentive and sanction mechanisms, and promote broader sustainability and climate mitigation goals in a practical manner. Nevertheless, as a limitation of this study, the model has only been tested in a single district, which restricts its generalizability; it should therefore be evaluated in other areas to confirm its applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.