ArticlePloS one2025
Validation of the Keen Eye computer-based method for diagnosing visual neglect using a dual-task paradigm.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual neglect is a common and disabling consequence of right hemisphere damage. Standard paper-and-pencil assessments may fail to detect subtle or well-compensated cases of neglect, especially under low attentional demands. This study presents and validates the Keen Eye computer-based method for diagnosing neglect using a dual-task paradigm. The method involves the simultaneous detection of lateralized visual targets and identification of centrally presented digits, increasing attentional load and sensitivity to spatial biases. We tested 102 patients with right hemisphere damage (38 with neglect, 64 without) using a predefined set of target positions that systematically varied across the visual field. Classification models based on error patterns and asymmetry coefficients demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing patients with neglect. The method also revealed quadrant-specific and vertically biased omissions. The findings support the utility of attention-demanding computer-based tasks for improving diagnostic precision in visual neglect and suggest potential for identifying subclinical or hidden neglect profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.